IJLI reviewers evaluate methodological rigor, data transparency, and freshwater relevance in submissions. Reviews should be constructive, objective, and aligned with journal policies.

Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality and disclose any potential conflicts before accepting an assignment.

• Sampling design, spatial coverage, and temporal replication
• Appropriate study design and statistical analysis
• Clarity of indicators, units, and detection limits
• Permits, ethical approvals, and environmental safeguards
• Relevance to freshwater science and management

Provide clear recommendations for revisions and highlight major methodological issues. Identify strengths alongside areas for improvement to support authors.

Manuscripts under review are confidential. Reviewers should not share content or use unpublished data. If a conflict of interest exists, notify the editorial office promptly so assignments can be adjusted.

Avoid reviewing manuscripts from close collaborators or direct competitors.

Reviewers are encouraged to submit reports within the requested timeframe. If additional time is needed, inform the editorial office early to avoid delays.

Declining assignments promptly helps reassign reviews quickly.

Timely reviews support timely dissemination.

Timeliness improves author experience.

Organize feedback around major and minor points to help authors prioritize revisions. Clear structure supports efficient editorial decisions and revisions.

Highlight any management or conservation implications that require clarification.

Provide citations when recommending changes to methods or interpretation.

Concise summaries help editors weigh recommendations.

Focus on actionable guidance.

Avoid overly vague comments.

Keep feedback concise and specific.

Prioritize critical issues first.

Focus on reproducibility where possible.

Respect author effort while remaining candid.

IJLI is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in limnology and freshwater science. We emphasize reproducible field and laboratory methods, clear reporting of water quality and ecological outcomes, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in freshwater ecology, hydrology, and environmental stewardship.