Reviewer Guidelines
Standards for rigorous and constructive peer review in oncology.
The Foundation of Cancer Science Quality
Peer review is the cornerstone of credible cancer research. Your expert evaluation ensures published work meets the highest standards of scientific validity and clinical relevance.
Timeliness
Complete reviews within 14 days of acceptance. Cancer researchers value rapid publication—if unable to meet deadlines, notify the editor promptly.
Objectivity
Evaluate manuscripts based solely on scientific and clinical merit. Provide evidence-based critique without personal or competitive bias.
Confidentiality
Treat manuscripts as confidential. Never share oncology findings, discuss content, or use ideas without author permission.
Constructiveness
Offer actionable suggestions for improvement. Even for rejections, provide feedback helping authors strengthen future cancer research submissions.
- Summary: Brief overview of the study and its contribution to oncology
- Major Comments: Methodological concerns, clinical validity, fundamental flaws
- Minor Comments: Clarity issues, statistical refinements, figure improvements
- Recommendation: Accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject
Questions About Reviewing?
Contact the editorial office for guidance.
