Editorial Policies
Integrity, quality, and fairness in transplant science publishing.
Upholding Scientific Standards
JOT adheres to guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Our policies protect the integrity of the scientific record.
Double-Blind Process
Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout review, minimizing bias and ensuring manuscripts are judged solely on scientific merit.
Expert Evaluation
Minimum two independent expert reviews required for all decisions. Editors select reviewers with relevant transplant expertise and no conflicts.
Constructive Feedback
Reviewers provide detailed, actionable comments. We expect professional, evidence-based critique aimed at improving manuscript quality.
Appeals Process
Authors may appeal editorial decisions in writing to the Editor-in-Chief with specific rebuttals to reviewer concerns and new supporting evidence.
Plagiarism Prevention
- iThenticate screening all submissions
- Self-plagiarism monitoring
- Duplicate publication detection
- Proper citation requirements
Conflicts of Interest
- Author financial disclosures
- Reviewer conflict declaration
- Editor recusal when needed
- Published declarations
Post-Publication
- Errata for minor errors
- Expressions of Concern investigation
- Retraction for serious issues
- COPE-compliant procedures
Reporting Concerns: Anyone suspecting research misconduct, ethical violations, or publication fraud may report confidentially to the Editor-in-Chief at [email protected]. All reports are investigated according to COPE guidelines.
Questions About Policies?
Contact our editorial office for clarification.
