Editorial Policies
Integrity, quality, and fairness in parasitology research publishing.
Upholding Scientific Standards
JPR adheres to guidelines established by COPE and ICMJE. Our policies protect the integrity of the parasitology literature and ensure transparent, ethical editorial processes.
Double-Blind Process
Both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, ensuring manuscripts are judged solely on scientific merit without institutional or geographic bias.
Expert Evaluation
Minimum two independent parasitology expert reviews required. Editors select reviewers with relevant expertise and no conflicts of interest.
Constructive Feedback
Reviewers provide detailed, actionable comments aimed at improving manuscript quality for advancing parasitology knowledge and disease control.
Appeals Process
Authors may appeal editorial decisions in writing with specific rebuttals and new supporting evidence within 30 days.
Plagiarism Prevention
- iThenticate screening all submissions
- Self-plagiarism monitoring
- Duplicate publication detection
- Proper citation requirements
Conflicts of Interest
- Pharmaceutical relationships
- Reviewer conflict screening
- Editor recusal when needed
- Published COI statements
Post-Publication
- Errata for minor errors
- Expressions of Concern
- Retraction for serious issues
- COPE-compliant procedures
Questions About Policies?
Contact our editorial office for clarification.
