Reviewer Resources
Tools and guidance for JBSC peer reviewers.
Review Support Center
Access resources to deliver high-quality, constructive peer reviews advancing CNS cancer publication standards.
Reviewer Portal
ManuscriptZone access for managing invitations, downloading manuscripts, and submitting reviews.
Review Templates
Structured frameworks for organizing feedback on neuro-oncology methodology and results.
Guidelines Access
Quick links to JBSC review standards and ethical expectations.
- Read manuscript thoroughly noting strengths and concerns
- Evaluate methodology, results interpretation, and clinical significance
- Provide specific, actionable suggestions for improvement
- Complete structured review form with recommendation
Support: Contact [email protected] for assistance with review submissions or manuscript questions.
Submit reviews within agreed deadlines typically 2-3 weeks. If delays are unavoidable, notify editorial office promptly.
High-quality reviews provide specific feedback addressing methodological rigor and presentation clarity with constructive suggestions.
Access orientation materials covering best practices, ethical expectations, and feedback approaches supporting review quality.
Access guidelines for handling suspected misconduct and conflicts during manuscript review. Report concerns to editors.
If unable to review due to conflicts or workload, decline promptly for reassignment. Suggesting alternatives is helpful.
Contribute to the CNS cancer peer review community supporting rigorous scientific publishing standards. Your expertise ensures quality research enters the literature.
Editors may provide feedback on review quality supporting professional development and enhancing future contributions.
All manuscripts are confidential. Do not share content or discuss submissions. Report conflicts immediately.
