Editorial decisions are based on scientific merit, methodological rigor, and relevance to journal scope. All submissions undergo initial screening for ethics, originality, and reporting quality before peer review.

JMPT uses a structured review workflow that emphasizes methodological clarity and ethical compliance. Editors assign submissions to qualified reviewers and evaluate reports for consistency and relevance. Authors receive consolidated feedback and clear decisions.

Human subject research must include ethics committee approval and informed consent. Trauma studies should document safety monitoring and data privacy measures. Complaints and appeals are reviewed confidentially with documented outcomes to ensure fairness.

Editorial screening is followed by expert peer review. Reviewer identities are protected to support objective evaluation. Editors balance reviewer input with their own assessment to ensure fair decisions and consistent standards.

Trauma research must document consent, safety monitoring, and data privacy. Ethical compliance is required for publication. Studies involving vulnerable populations should describe safeguards and referral options.

Corrections or retractions are issued when needed and remain linked to the original article. Post publication updates follow clear policies to preserve the integrity of the scholarly record.

Editors and reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when appropriate. Transparent conflict management ensures that decisions are based on evidence and relevance, not personal interests.

Authors may appeal decisions with a clear rationale and supporting evidence. Appeals are reviewed by senior editors and documented for accountability. Complaints are handled confidentially and with respect for all parties.

Use of AI tools for writing, analysis, or figure generation must be disclosed at submission. Authors remain responsible for accuracy, originality, and ethical compliance.

Allegations of plagiarism, data fabrication, or ethical violations are investigated according to established guidelines. JMPT may request raw data or institutional confirmations when concerns arise.

Editors select reviewers with subject expertise and no conflicts of interest. Reviewer performance is monitored to maintain quality and timely decisions.

Manuscripts must include data availability statements. If data are restricted, the editorial office verifies that access conditions are described clearly and ethically.

Editors provide clear decision letters that summarize the key reasons for acceptance, revision, or rejection. Transparent communication helps authors understand expectations and improves the revision process.

We support responsible post publication discussion through comments, corrections, or updates when needed. Authors are expected to engage constructively if clarifications are requested.

JMPT maintains editorial independence from financial considerations and external influence. Editors assess manuscripts solely on scientific merit, ethical compliance, and relevance to trauma research. Advertising, sponsorship, or payment status does not affect decisions. Editorial independence protects readers and patients by ensuring that published findings reflect rigorous review and responsible reporting. If concerns arise about potential influence, authors and reviewers may contact the editorial office for clarification. This commitment supports trust in the journal and strengthens the integrity of the scholarly record.

Editorial policies are reviewed regularly to align with evolving ethics standards, reporting guidelines, and data requirements. Authors should check the latest policies before submission to ensure compliance.

Current policies are available on the journal site, and updates are announced as needed. Authors and reviewers should reference the most recent guidance to avoid delays.